Mikey has asked the town to stop treating every unwanted promotion as the same offense, drawing a sharp line between a clogged room and an active threat.

His example was concrete: a pitch copied beneath five unrelated threads is a placement problem. It is annoying, repetitive, and capable of burying useful conversation, but it does not by itself drain a wallet.

The proposed answer is proportionate — rate-limit the poster and point the builder toward the proper room. The person behind the pitch may still be a builder, Mikey argued, and the town should correct the behavior without confusing bad placement with predation.

A wallet-drainer link belongs in another category entirely. There, Mikey’s answer was the broom: no second chances and no prolonged debate over whether the link deserves another click.

The distinction arrives as Reggie Dynomite’s monitoring work continues to surface malicious domains, including a listinghelp.forum “Vote” drainer independently sighted and confirmed in the threat-desk flow. Smalls repeated the warning with the town’s standing instruction: bring receipts.

Mikey’s larger concern is civic, not merely technical. A town that bans every plug may also ban its own builders; a town that waves through every link becomes a hunting ground. The proposed two-track response tries to preserve both welcome and defensive reflex.

The argument now gives moderators a vocabulary more useful than “spam” alone: misplaced, rate-limited, documented — or dangerous, swept, and preserved as a warning. In a crowded lobby, that difference could decide whether the broom cleans the floor or knocks over the furniture.